OPEN LETTER TO DR. FEMI OKUROUNMU ON NATIONAL DIALOGUE.
Dear
Sir,
As
you commence the noble task of defining the modalities and parameters through
which a national dialogue (sovereign or not) can be convened; permit me to
refer you to one of my past articles written and published by Sunday
Independent Newspapers sometime in January 2012.
I
sincerely hope some of the points/concerns raised in this article will assist
your committee in fashioning out a truly purposeful National dialogue format
with concrete terms of reference.
Good
luck sir.
Stanley
Nwabia
READ ON:
SOVEREIGN
NATIONAL CONFERENCE: WHO WILL REPRESENT ME?
(First published in January 2012 on Sunday Independent Newspapers)
The
call for convocation of a Sovereign National Conference has for some time now
become a mantra for certain pro democracy, civil rights and cultural groups.
The agitation for SNC began right after the annulment of June 12 presidential
elections in 1993 when it became clear to many in the south that the only
reason why Chief MKO Abiola was denied his presidential mandate was because he
was from the wrong ethnic group. Associations like NADECO and other pro
democracy groups emerged with a call and demand for a Sovereign National Conference
as the only antidote to Nigeria’s huge basket of problems. Fast forward to the
year 2012 and the call for SNC has become even louder, why with the horrifying
plague of Boko-Haram in the North, restiveness in the Niger-Delta, alleged marginalization
of the South-East, Religious/Ethnic conflicts here and there, obviously there
may be no other way out.
Nigerian
Activists have defined Sovereign National Conference as the coming together of
all ethnic nationalities in order to discuss, express their individual rights
to self determination and chart the way forward for Nigeria. While this is not
entirely a bad idea, the word ‘sovereign’ is perhaps quite worrisome as it suggests
that each ethnic group would reserves the ultimate power and right to make,
stand by and execute its own decision at the conference. Thus if ethnic group A
decides to go its separate way, its decision is final. Examples of countries
that have broken up into several pieces are abound; the Soviet Union,
Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia and more recently the Sudan. Proponents of SNC are
of the view that if Nigeria must remain together, all ethnic groups must agree
to remain part of Nigeria provided respective terms and conditions are met.
As
at last count, Nigeria has about two hundred and fifty ethnic groups, each with
distinct languages and dialects. What this means is that assuming the SNC is convened
with ethnic nationalities providing two delegates each, we are looking at five
hundred delegates at least? Another mock question is; can two people adequately
represent the interests of an entire ethnic group? Considering the fact that
every single ethnic group in Nigeria has its own sub groups and clans with various
interests bordering on religion, trade, profession, customs, land issues etc. Obviously,
each ethnic nationality will require more than two delegates. However if we
must stick with two delegates per ethnic group, then one will expect that
before the convocation of a Sovereign National Conference, all ethnic
nationalities must first convene their own respective ‘sovereign clan, age-grade
or village conference(s) where all their positions will be harmonized and then
two delegates can now be mandated to go represent them at the national
conference. Easier said than done, if you ask me.
Many
are yet to realise that no ethnic group in Nigeria is homogenous in the real
sense of the word. Yorubas may be referred to as an ethnic group or tribe, but
within the Yorubas there are many sub-groups like the
Egbas,Aworis,Ifes,Modaekes to mention a few, each with their own distinct
dialects,customs,interests and aspirations. Can any persons or group of people
truly rise up and claim to represent the interests of Yoruba nation as a whole?
This challenge is obtainable amongst every other ethnic grouping in Nigeria.
Most
of us have truly under-estimated the level of integration amongst different Nigerian
ethnic groups; decades of inter-tribal marriages have produced a generation of
multi-ethnic Nigerians with maternal and paternal lineages stretching all over
and across the river Niger. Who is going to represent the interests of these
unique set of Nigerians during the (Sovereign) National Conference? Or will
they be forced to choose between aligning with either their paternal or
maternal ethnic lineage? Another unfortunate oversight from advocates of SNC is
the narrowing of every Nigerian’s interests along ethnic lines.
For instance,
will a Sovereign National Conference address the immediate and long-term needs
of University professors who are members of ASUU? Or do we now have to do a
sort of ethnic profiling amongst the academia, in order to ascertain the individual
needs of Yoruba, Igbo or Hausa professors. Do these learned people now have to
go back to their respective ethnic conclaves in order to channel their demands
and interests for better conditions of service at the SNC? Same goes for all other professional and
non-professional interest groups in Nigeria.
In
any case, let’s assume the Sovereign National Conference kicks off with a
conservative estimate of five hundred delegates at two delegates per ethnic nationality;
there has to be a location, methinks Abuja. What will be the duration of the
conference? Where will the delegates stay? Who will feed them? Will they
receive sitting allowances? Who will pay for it, the existing Nigerian government?
Laughable, isn’t it?
Advocates
of SNC have made numerous references to the United States of America in 1776
when its then thirteen colonies agreed to come together and declare their
independence as one country under God. The thirteen colonies may have indeed
agreed to come together but let’s not forget that these American colonies were
established by European (mainly British) industrialists and pirates. The
indigenous Americans-owners of the land, commonly referred to as Red Indians
were never consulted before the creation of a United States of America. The
black African slaves who worked on the plantations where never consulted before
agreeing to become citizens of the USA. But today, America is a world power and
economic success because most of her leaders from independence did the right
thing and developed the country.
Surely if America had failed to become an industrialized
country today with poverty and insecurity rife, all her numerous nationalities
would have started agitating for all sorts ranging from secession, repatriation to self determination.
I
want to assure all proponents of a Sovereign National Conference that most great
nations in today’s world did not come about as the result of a ‘sweet history’
where different nationalities sat on a
round table and decided to live together peacefully and create a China, Japan, Brazil
or Australia. Many industrialized countries of today emerged from a history of
wars, slavery, barbarism, colonialism, invasion, nepotism and unspeakable
injustice. However, somewhere along the line these countries were able to
realise that the basic needs of all men (and women) are the same, regardless of
race, tribe, religion or gender. Every citizen desires a good life.
Do
we need a Sovereign National Conference to tell us that Hausas, Yorubas and Igbos
want steady electricity, good health care and security? Do we need a Sovereign
National Conference to tell us that the Ijaws, Efiks, Itsekiris and Ibibios
want good schools, clean drinking water, three square meals, and reliable
source of income, just like any other modern human society? Perhaps what we need
in reality is sovereign national COMMON SENSE; a time when all our political
and opinion leaders realise the need to kill corruption in Nigeria while effectively
harnessing the economic and human resources in all Nigeria’s thirty six states
in order to improve the life of THE NIGERIAN.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your COMMENT is your POWER...on this blog at least !!!